Design Schools in Michigan

3 schools compared · Average earnings $25,208/yr

3 Michigan schools offer Design. Average graduate earnings run 12% below the national average — something worth factoring in alongside tuition, location, and program fit.

Schools in MI
3
Avg Grad Earnings
$25,208/yr
-12% vs. national avg
Avg Score
47/100

Design Training in Michigan: What You Need to Know

Local program supply

Michigan has 3 schools offering Design programs. Most students attend within 60 miles of home — local choice matters more than national rankings.

Earnings vs. national

Design graduates in Michigan earn approximately $25,208/year on average, which is -12% below the national average for this trade. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.

Michigan-specific licensing

Most skilled trades require a state-issued license or certification before you can work independently. Requirements vary substantially by state. Verify Michigan-specific licensing through the relevant state board (Department of Labor, Contractors Board, or trade-specific licensing body). Apprenticeship hours often count toward licensure.

How Michigan compares

Average TradeSchoolOutlook Score for Design programs in Michigan is 47/100. Cost of living, wage levels, and program supply all vary by state — see the school list below ranked by TradeSchoolOutlook Score, which combines earnings, debt, and job-market demand.

Design Programs in Michigan

All 3 Michigan schools offering Design, ranked by TradeSchoolOutlook Score. Click a school to see full earnings projections and program details.

# School Score Earnings ROI
1 Oakland Community College
Auburn Hills, MI
61 $38,657/yr 63.0x
2 Macomb Community College
Warren, MI
40 $17,057/yr 61.9x
3 Henry Ford College
Dearborn, MI
41 $19,911/yr 36.0x

Compare Design in Other States

Considering a nearby state? Here's how Michigan compares to others with strong Design offerings.

← See Design programs across all states
Data from College Scorecard, Bureau of Labor Statistics 2024–2034, and DOL RAPIDS. Methodology & sources →